Difference between revisions of "Pfeifer v. City of Little Rock"

From FranaWiki
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Pfeifer v. City of Little Rock''''' was a lawsuit filed by [[Eugene Pfeifer III]] in 2000. Pfeifer argued that park revenue bonds could not be used to secure the site of the [[William J. Clinton Presidential Library and Park]] because the land had not been zoned as parkland by the [[City of Little Rock]]. [[Tom Carpenter]] represented the City of Little Rock in the case.  
+
'''''Pfeifer v. City of Little Rock''''' was a lawsuit filed by [[Eugene Pfeifer III]] in 2000. Pfeifer argued that park revenue bonds could not be used to secure the site of the [[William J. Clinton Presidential Center and Park]] because the land had not been zoned as parkland by the [[City of Little Rock]]. [[Tom Carpenter]] represented the City of Little Rock in the case.  
  
 
Pfeifer's attorney's appealed the case in May 2001. In their Arkansas Supreme Court briefs filed in October 2001 attorneys for the plaintiff argued that the [[City of Little Rock]] had improperly exercised its powers of eminent domain to seize 2.9 acres of Pfeifer's land for the [[Clinton Presidential Center]] site because it was not destined to become a public park.
 
Pfeifer's attorney's appealed the case in May 2001. In their Arkansas Supreme Court briefs filed in October 2001 attorneys for the plaintiff argued that the [[City of Little Rock]] had improperly exercised its powers of eminent domain to seize 2.9 acres of Pfeifer's land for the [[Clinton Presidential Center]] site because it was not destined to become a public park.

Revision as of 10:29, 17 February 2008

Pfeifer v. City of Little Rock was a lawsuit filed by Eugene Pfeifer III in 2000. Pfeifer argued that park revenue bonds could not be used to secure the site of the William J. Clinton Presidential Center and Park because the land had not been zoned as parkland by the City of Little Rock. Tom Carpenter represented the City of Little Rock in the case.

Pfeifer's attorney's appealed the case in May 2001. In their Arkansas Supreme Court briefs filed in October 2001 attorneys for the plaintiff argued that the City of Little Rock had improperly exercised its powers of eminent domain to seize 2.9 acres of Pfeifer's land for the Clinton Presidential Center site because it was not destined to become a public park.

On November 1, 2001, the Supreme Court returned a unanimous verdict on behalf of the defendant in the case, ruling that the City's action in taking the land was proper.

References

  • "Arguments in Clinton Library Case," New York Times, October 26, 2001.
  • David Firestone, "A Fight Over Land for Library," New York Times,May 2, 2001.
  • Kevin Sack, "Clinton Library Lawsuit Rejected," New York Times, November 2, 2001.

External links